Anunţ publicitar al Statului Român in ziarele mari ale lumii:

Cine a putut, ştiut şi vrut a plecat.

Avem nevoie de ajutor!
Plătim la nivelul pieţei.
Preferăm vorbitori de Româna!


poante § intelart § cafeneaua
© 2005
cel mai vechi blog peromaneste


Fa ce spune popa, nu ce face popa!

Wesley Clark Calls for Internment Camps for "Radicalized" Americans
Murtaza Hussain

Retired general and former Democratic presidential candidate Wesley Clark on Friday called for World War II-style internment camps to be revived for “disloyal Americans.” In an interview with MSNBC’s Thomas Roberts in the wake of the mass shooting in Chatanooga, Tennessee, Clark said that during World War II, “if someone supported Nazi Germany at the expense of the United States, we didn’t say that was freedom of speech, we put him in a camp, they were prisoners of war.”

He called for a revival of internment camps to help combat Muslim extremism, saying, “If these people are radicalized and they don’t support the United States and they are disloyal to the United States as a matter of principle, fine. It’s their right and it’s our right and obligation to segregate them from the normal community for the duration of the conflict.”
The comments were shockingly out of character for Clark, who after serving as supreme allied commander of NATO made a name for himself in progressive political circles. In 2004, his campaign for the Democratic presidential nomination was highly critical of the Bush administration’s excessive response to the 9/11 terror attacks. Since then, he has been a critic of policies that violate the Geneva Convention, saying in 2006 that policies such as torture violate “the very values that [we] espouse.”

In a memoir written the following year, he also famously alleged that the White House under Bush had developed a massively imperialistic plan for the Middle East, which would see the administration attempt to “take out seven countries in five years,” beginning with the invasions in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Earlier this year I spoke with Clark at the annual Lewis and Clark University Symposium on International Affairs in Portland, Oregon. The subject of our discussion was how to deal with the potential threat of foreign fighters returning from armed conflicts abroad. At the time, Clark spoke out strongly against “the politics of fear” and eroding democratic institutions and norms, while reiterating his criticism of the excesses committed by Bush-era neoconservatives under the banner of fighting terrorism.

But on Friday, he was advocating the revival of a policy widely considered to be among the most shameful chapters in American history: World War II domestic internment camps. Aside from the inherent problems in criminalizing people for their beliefs, Clark’s proposal (which his MSNBC interlocutor did not challenge him on) also appears to be based on the concept of targeting people for government scrutiny who are not even “radicalized,” but who the government decides may be subject to radicalization in the future. That radicalization itself is a highly amorphous and politically malleable concept only makes this proposal more troubling.

“We have got to identify the people who are most likely to be radicalized. We’ve got to cut this off at the beginning,” Clark said. “I do think on a national policy level we need to look at what self-radicalization means because we are at war with this group of terrorists.” And he added that “not only the United States but our allied nations like Britain, Germany and France are going to have to look at their domestic law procedures.”

Despite an outcry about his comments on social media, Clark has not responded publicly. As of Monday morning, his latest tweet was from Friday, encouraging his followers to watch his interview.

Update 07/21/15 11:12AM EST:
General Clark did not respond to subsequent requests for comment on the story, although a spokesperson for his office did reach out to raise questions about the title. On his Twitter feed however, Clark appeared to reiterate his comments for detaining “seditious” individuals at home who might be connected to ISIS:

Supreme Court Justice Predicts Return of Internment Camps -

On Tuesday Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia was quoted, in a Washington Examiner article, discussing the possible return of World War II style “internment camps”:
Justice Antonin Scalia predicts that the Supreme Court will eventually authorize another a wartime abuse of civil rights such as the internment camps for Japanese-Americans during World War II.
“You are kidding yourself if you think the same thing will not happen again,” Scalia told the University of Hawaii law school while discussing Korematsu v. United States, the ruling in which the court gave its imprimatur to the internment camps.
The local Associated Press report quotes Scalia as using a Latin phrase that means “in times of war, the laws fall silent,” to explain why the court erred in that decision and will do so again.
“That’s what was going on — the panic about the war and the invasion of the Pacific and whatnot,” Scalia said. “That’s what happens. It was wrong, but I would not be surprised to see it happen again, in time of war. It’s no justification but it is the reality.”
The discussion of “FEMA Camps” has long been attributed to the over-active minds of conspiracy theorists, but when a Supreme Court Justice speaks on the issue, it would behoove people to listen.
Whether you personally believe in FEMA Camps or not, the evidence is abundant that plans have been in place for decades to deal with another “internment camp” situation.
Have you ever heard of REX-84?
Rex 84, short for Readiness Exercise 1984, was a secretive “scenario and drill” developed by the United States federal government to suspend the United States ollienorthConstitution, declare martial law, place military commanders in charge of state and local governments, and detain large numbers of American citizens who are deemed to be “national security threats”, in the event that the President declares a “State of National Emergency”. The plan states events causing such a declaration would be widespread U.S. opposition to a U.S. military invasion abroad, such as if the United States were to directly invade Central America.[1][2][3][4][5] To combat what the government perceived as “subversive activities”, the plan also authorized the military to direct ordered movements of civilian populations at state and regional levels.[6]
Rex 84 was written by Lieutenant Colonel Oliver North, who was both National Security Council White House Aide, and NSC liaison to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), and John Brinkerhoff, the deputy director of “national preparedness” programs for the FEMA. They patterned the plan on a 1970 report written by FEMA chief Louis Giuffrida, at the Army War College, which proposed the detention of up to 21 million “American Negroes”, if there were a black militant uprising in the United States.[1][7]Existence of a master military contingency plan (of which REX-84 was a part), “Garden Plot” and a similar earlier exercise, “Lantern Spike”, were originally revealed by journalist Ron Ridenhour, who summarized his findings in an article in CounterSpy.[8]
REX-84 is not some conspiracy theory. It is now a part of American history. It is proof that our federal government was discussing contingencies for “FEMA Camps” long before most conspiracy theorists knew what a FEMA camp was.
I am a firm believer that when high-profile political figures speak that we should listen and learn to read between the lines. For Antonin Scalia to make these statements is a bit risky on his part. He knows the statements will be viewed as controversial and yet he probably does not feel at liberty to reveal as much as he would like. Why? Because revealing too much could jeopardize his career or even his very life.
When Dan Bongino (a former Obama Secret Service Agent) says something like, “It’s worse than people know… and I’m not trying to scare you either”, I believe that people should listen. Obviously that is a clue that something is amiss and he is not at liberty to give details.
Americans need to wake up. Things are not right and Scalia is trying to warn us, in my opinion. Let us not forget the DHS whistleblower, Julia Davis, who was bold enough to tell us last year that the war on terror was not as it is perceived to be, and that the real target is American citizens:
“It makes me think that he so-called ‘War on Terror’ is more of a charade and that the priority of the agency seems to be to target concerned citizens and whistleblowers because in my case… they sent an airplane to follow me… they had eight agents at a time following me… they used airplanes, vehicles, helicopters… they used OnStar to listen to what was being said in our cars.”
The next time we see the “reality” of internment camps it may not be Japanese-Americans or any other ethnicity who is targeted. Just as with the IRS scandal, it could very well be dependent on one’s own political ideology.
All we can do is be prepared as possible.
We ran an article a short time ago about FEMA Camps and the recent orders to equip 1000 tent hospitals in the USA. After running that article I read a comment from a woman who said that she wouldn’t need a FEMA Camp. She would be fine on her own.
I think some people are still missing the point if they think they will be given a choice in the matter.

Keep it simple. I believe in God, Family and Country (in that order). My articles can be freely reproduced in full, or in part, so long as you credit me as the author and provide some sort of link to 

5 comentarii:

Anonim spunea...

Clark are dreptate, Islamul politic modern se dovedeşte incomatibil cu lumea civilizată. Sharia n-are ce căuta în nicio țară civilizată. Singura replică realistă dată statului islamic este uciderea tuturor membrilor organizației. Propunerea mea ar fi ghilotina, ca replică tăietorilor de capete. Brutalitatea guvernării este o necesitate în acea parte a lumii. Brutalitatea regimurilor Saddam, Assad, Mubarak, Sisi, chiar Ghadafi era o necesitate, altfel acele popoare nu pot fi ținute în frâu. Înlăturarea acestor regimuri cu care se putea discuta este imensa eroare nerecunoscută a Americii. Ce-a adus primăvara arabă? Tăietori de capete.

peromaneste spunea...

Anonim, Clark discuta despre reinfiintarea centrelor de detentie in SUA, Cel mai recent acestea au functionat in timpul RMII cu japonezii, iar generatiile succesive de americani au considerat toata acea poveste un abuz etc. Ghilotina a fost si ea o creatie singulara a unor timpuri singulare. Acestea fiind spuse, care sunt conditiile singulare de acum? Cum si in ce termeni pot fi acestea determinate acum?

Gabriel spunea...

Condițiile sunt evidente: lumea întreagă este amenințată de barbaria islamistă. Chemările la luptă/crimă ale ISIS nu au rămas simple discursuri sforăitoare ci iată că sunt ascultate de musulmani care nu se consideră emigranți ci cuceritori.

Gabriel spunea...

Nu îmi fac iluzii: Occidentul este condamnat. Instinctul de consevare îi este paralizat de cangrena corectitudinii poltice aliată cu corupția afacerilor cu saudiții. Arabia Saudită este la fel de barbară ca şi ISIS.
Ei vor fi colonizați lent. Ştiu că sunt clişee, dar asta nu înseamnă că nu sunt adevărate.
America nu lagăre sau ghilotine pregăteşte pentru ISIS, ci credite fără dobândă pentru musulmani din motive religioase (Seattle) sau consiliere psihologică pentru luptătorii ISIS.
O judecată sănătoasă ar trebui să impună Vestului stoparea prin orice mijloace a migrației din țări islamice şi repatrierea celor deja aflați acolo. Însă viermele corectitudinii politice le roade judecata şi nu vor putea face nimic. Asta şi fetişizarea legii, în condițiile în care corectitudinea politică îi împiedică s-o adapteze realităților cu care se confruntă.

Anonim spunea...

ISIS e doar perdea de fum. Protagonistii dramoletei timpului nostru sunt SUA versus China sau Vestul versus Asia.


Postări populare